Abstract
This module explores the impact of "doing nothing" within the field of economics, focusing on the overlooked concept of inertia in both microeconomic and macroeconomic contexts. By examining key concepts such as "trade freeze," "fiscal trends," "savings pond," and "stagnant spending," this paper provides a marginalized perspective on passive economic strategies in relation to conventional active approaches. This approach emphasizes cognitive inertia inverse to behavioral inertia. Utilizing secondary data, the analysis reveals the complexities and benefits associated with cognitive inertia, highlighting its potential advantages and the beneficiaries it affects. The study not only addresses the physical dynamics of the economy but also delves into the behavioral habits linked to inertia, offering insights into its role in contemporary unproductive economic practices.
References
[1] Murphy, J. (1963). The power of your subconscious mind. Prentice-Hall.
[2] Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. Wiley.
[3] Mattila, A. S. (2020). Impact of cognitive inertia on postconsumption evaluation processes. Retrieved from ResearchGate.
[4] Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
[5] Morisna, A., Lubis, R. A., & Sulaiman. (2017). The influence of brand experience on brand loyalty mediated by brand trust and satisfaction (empirical study on brands of Body Shop in Banda Aceh, Indonesia). Retrieved from EAS publisher.
[6] Sharma, P. (2021). Psychological factors in determining consumer experience. Retrieved from inspirajournals.
[7] McKibbin, W., & Fernando, R. (2020). The global economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Retrieved from White Rose Research Online.
[8] Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1(1), 39-60. Retrieved from ResearchGate.
[9] Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (2007). Heuristics and biases in retirement savings behavior. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3), 81-104. Retrieved from ResearchGate.
[10] Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(1), 9-64. Retrieved from ResearchGate.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Vincy C (Author)